It’s
unprecedented: Malawi is now officially trading in carbon - an arrangement in
which big polluters in the developed world are said to be reducing their emissions
by funding projects that benefit poor nations who despite polluting less, bear
the blunt of the developed countries’ pollution.
The Malawigovernment has just given an approval letter to CarbonSoft Corporation a London
based carbon credit aggregator to start distributing solar lamps in Malawi’s
rural and unelectrified households.
“This
[distribution of lamps] will enable them to stop burning kerosene, a highly
potent greenhouse gas, for light, preventing CO2 emissions. CarbonSoft
estimates that over the course of the six-year project, approximately
forty-nine thousand tonnes of CO2 will be saved in this way, generating one
carbon credit per tonne,” said CarbonSoft in a release published on prweb.com.
The solar light program is at the leading edge of a worldwide movement
to reduce the burning of kerosene, key to the objectives of the Rio +20
conference on Sustainable Development, and the International Year of Sustainable Energy For All in 2012.
Shamiso Najira, Chief
Environmental Officer and Focal Point for Clean Development Mechanism of the Environmental
Affairs Department in the ministry environment and climate change said the approval was
only given upon the Malawi government liking the project concept of CarbonSoft.
She said the role
of the government will be to promote the project and said it would cover the
whole country, a move which effectively means that CarbonSoft is aiming at
eliminating Kerosene lamps in Malawi.
CarbonSoft is a
carbon credits aggregator, it funds such projects and sells what ‘carbon credits’
a form of currency. The Collins English Dictionary defines a carbon credit as “a certificate showing that a government or
company has paid to have a certain amount of carbon dioxide removed from the
environment.” What this means however is that that company or government
that has bought the credits maintains their pollution and uses the carbon
credits to justify it.
Some people argue that the whole carbon trading idea only allows rich nations to pollute more
and not decrease their emissions because they
hide under the veil of buying carbon credits which are moneys given to a
broker who is reducing carbon emissions elsewhere.
One critic of carbon
trading writing in Time Magazine took
a swipe at the practice saying: “In other words, the rich reduce their carbon output by not one ounce.
But drawing on the hundreds of millions of net worth in the Kodak Theatre, they
pull out lunch money to buy ecological indulgences.”
“The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has
been a failure under any metric you look at,” said Oscar Reyes, Associate
Fellow, of the Institute for Policy Studies speaking at a press conference
arranged by the forestry policy NGO FERN at the UN climate talks in Bonn
Said Reyes: “Its credit price is lower than a
snake’s belly and its environmental integrity is about the same – there’s
little proof it has produced real, actual, additional emission reductions...”
Will Farmers Like Ngwira really benefit from carbon trading |
Shamiso Najira
when asked if the project is enough to address the climate change effects was
non-committal and said it depends on the ones understanding of the issue.
“It’s up to us
as a country, if it contributes to our sustainable development it is fine,”
said Najira
Even the civil
society is not sure of the carbon trade, William Chadza, Executive Director of
the Centre for Environmental Policy and Advocacy (CEPA) said the issue has two
faces.
“On one hand it is a welcome as it will lead to
increased access to sustainable energy; address the challenges of our narrow Energy
Policy; provides opportunities for financial gains from carbon markets; and
increases Malawi's efforts towards climate change mitigation.
“Conversely, there is growing evidence suggesting that
most of the carbon trading related interventions have the west as the
major beneficiary as these interventions will only lead to perpetuating
greenhouse gas emissions.
“As more of
these carbon trading related interventions get underway, the more levels
of greenhouse gas emissions in the west remain the same. It is like providing
permits to pollute. It promotes business as usual approach. In addition, recent
figures on prices of carbon per tonne seem unattractive to warrant significant
livelihood changes which the proponents seem to be portraying.” Said Chadza
Chadza said
there is need to do a good cost-benefit analysis on the issue; meanwhile the
rich nations will keep emitting carbon and using their huge profits to buy
carbon credits.
It is the
likes of Stanley
Ngwira a teacher at Thunduti Secondary School at Uliwa in Karonga that will
keep suffering.
Early this
year rains took a break for almost three weeks when Ngwira’s maize needed it
most, the result was almost no yield at all, Ngwira is putting his hopes on the
salary he gets from his job as a teacher and even then, his year looks bleak
and there are far more people like Ngwira many who do not have a salary.
For Ngwira,
the solar lamp he is likely to receive from CarbonSoft will just be used at
night but the gruesome effects of erratic weather likely to be the result of
climate change may haunt him for a long time.