Recently
Malawian authorities announced English is to become the language of pedagogy from
as early as Standard 1. Some ‘experts’ have fumed and foamed over the plan
saying it is all kinds of bad, I am here to unpack and attack the so called
experts and to express support for the plan to Anglicize Malawi.
I
completed a year as English major at Mzuzu University before defecting to The
University of Malawi. My research project was on language and the theorists
that inform(ed) me include Stuart Hall, Noam Chomsky and Karl Marx. This, I state,
lest I be deemed a stranger on the issue.
Now
that you know I am versed in language dogma, I would like to tear apart what experts
have lied to you on the issue.
Japan,
China and South Korea do not use English and some say we should follow their
models. But these guys have their own established alphabets, we have an English
alphabet. The three
translated all important texts such as Anne Frank and Calculus; can anyone step
forward and write a Chichewa or Chitumbuka book on Econometrics?
We simply cannot do it, we are too poor and we
must rely on English, now what is the reason of teaching a child in Chichewa at
a young age when he is going to need English when he reaches standard 5 or 6? Would
it not be better to give him a head start at standard one?
Knowledge in Malawi occurs in English books,
not vernacular, and to know English is by default to know more – English opens
up the gates to knowledge.
Public schools currently teach children in
Chichewa yet most of the kids in Malawi are not Chewa – if teaching in vernacular
is so important for Children, why does every tribe not learn in their language?
You have Sena children learning about Maliro ndi Miyambo ya a Chewa, as if
they don’t have Miyambo.
In Tanzania they use Swahili. There is no
tribe called Swahili - all tribes have their own languages and dump them for
Swahili which is a hybrid language. English will foster unity as no one will be
aggrieved of being forced to speak another’s language.
I did
my school in English and Chichewa and went home to speak Chitumbuka; I never
got confused or left out. And if Bingu wa Mutharika’s rants are anything to go
by, people from areas where we have to internalize three languages ended up
dominating the university system so much that they introduced Quotas.
Back to China, Japan and South Korea, these
countries are the biggest importers of English teachers. They are proud, yes,
but they need English – English is just too important to play with. In China
now English is mandatory to graduate.
How many people speak Chichewa or Chitumbuka
or Yao? What will having a good command of vernacular benefit us in 2030? Where
can we apply miyambi in ICT or
International Business? Let us stop the drama and get aggressive with modernization.
Russia abandoned its Communism, China too –
the only way out of poverty is going full throttle into Western ways and the
best way to start is by language. English will put us at par with the developed
world; vernacular will keep us dancing Beni.
Most experts that speak against using English
from grade one are well off people who learnt in English in the 80s and whose children
go to English speaking private Kindergartens and primary schools. Why are they
trying to condemn the rest of the nation to a useless vernacular curriculum?
Scholar’s of Jean Piaget and other educational
psychologists say a child can uptake up to five languages, I mean, their brains
are like sponges, everything that comes, they absorb, ably. It’s why kids are
so good at learning new languages.
The experts cry that there are not enough
teachers to teach in English but you mean the current teachers in schools
cannot speak English and yet they allowed to teach?
The experts say English will confuse students
as it is unfamiliar, they forget that the pupil only spends half a day at
school and spends the rest of the day at home where they are spoken to in
vernacular –if their logic is anything, wouldn’t the teaching of maths similarly
confuse them since maths is as unfamiliar?
I heard someone warn that English would cause the
Chichewa speaking standards to plummet, to him I say: who cares? Again, in 2015
what does speaking good Chichewa get you? Some airtime on the radio during the poetry
segment, I bet, and that’s all.
These Karangas are just spooked tribalists
parading as experts, first they seem oblivious of the fact that Malawi is
highly linguistically diverse and therefore using vernacular is potentially oppressive
as, like has been the case so far, one vernacular language will be imposed on
many groups.
The experts also seem to underrate the fact
that children are not empty slates; they are intelligent and can handle pretty
much everything the system throws at them in school.
If we can, let us introduce English in
pre-school and in our homes, let us talk to our children in English –
vernacular will take Malawi nowhere and the more English the kids know, the
better chances they have in excelling
life, after all from standard 5, everything is in English.
All those who are against the plan should
state the importance of vernacular in an English world – This is a great
opportunity for Malawi to transform into a nation, so far these so called experts
want it to remain a village.
So let those Chanco students who petitioned
government against English bask in their vain pursuit of attention, let tribalists
root for their vernacular, ignore them, do this for a prosperous Malawi.
Some of you are worried because you cannot
perfectly get around English, you failed to learn, you are untrainable - we
should focus on the kids that are to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment